Adams, Katherine H. A History of Professional Writing Instruction in American Colleges
Adorno, Theodore. “Is Art Lighthearted?”
Adorno, Theodore. Aesthetic Theory
Althusser, Louis. "Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses."
Amato & Fleisher. “Reforming Creative Writing Pedagogy: History as Knowledge, Knowledge as Activism”
Anzaldúa, Gloria. Borderlands: The New Mestiza = La Frontera
Barreca, Regina, and Deborah Denenholz Morse, eds. The Erotics of Instruction
Bartholomae, David, Peter Elbow, Don H. Bialostosky, Wendy Bishop, and Susan Welch. “Interchanges: Responses to Bartholomae and Elbow”
Berlin, James A. Rhetorics, Poetics, and Cultures
Berman, Jeffrey. Empathic Teaching: Education for Life
Bishop, Wendy. Released into Language: Options for Teaching Creative Writing
Bernstein, Basil (ed.). Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity
---, ed. Primary Socialization, Language and Education
---. The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse
Berry, Roger W. Creative Writing: A Review of the Study at the College Level
Bishop, Wendy. "On Being in the Same Boat: A History of Creative Writing and Composition Writing in American Universities."
---. Working Words: The Process of Creative Writing.
Bishop & Starkey (eds.). Keywords in Creative Writing
Bishop & Ostrom (eds.). Colors of a Different Horse: Rethinking Creative Writing Theory and Pedagogy
Bizzaro, Patrick. Responding to Student Poems: Applications of Critical Theory
Bourdieu, Pierre. (trans. Randal Johnson). The Field of Cultural Production [Graduate]
Bly, Carol. Beyond the Writers’ Workshop: New Ways to Write Creative Nonfiction
Bly, Robert. American Poetry: Wildness and Domesticity
Bogan, Louise. Poet's Alphabet: Reflections on the Literary Art and Vocation
Bolter, Jay David. Writing Space: The Computer, Hypertext, and the History of Writing
Bourdieu, Pierre. (trans. Randal Johnson). The Field of Cultural Production [Graduate]
Bridwell-Bowles, Lillian. "Discourse and Diversity: Experimental Writing Within the Academy.”
Calvino, Italo, et al. Oulipo Laboratory: Texts from the Bibliotheque Oulipienne (Anti-Classics of Dada.)
Castells, Manuel, Ramón Flecha, Paulo Freire, Henry A. Giroux, Donaldo Macedo, and Paul Willis. Critical Education in the New Information Age
Chabon, Michael. Wonder Boys
Clifford, John, and John Schilb (eds.). Writing Theory and Critical Theory
Collom, Jack, and Sheryl Noethe. Poetry Everywhere: Teaching Poetry Writing in School and in the Community
Crowley and Hawhee, Ancient Rhetorics for Contemporary StudentsD
elbanco, Nicholas. “In Praise of Imitation”
Dewey, John. Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education
Elbow, Peter. "Being a Writer vs. Being an Academic: A Conflict in Goals."
---. Writing Without Teachers
Erdrich, Louise. Bluejay’s Dance
Foster and Prevallet. Third Mind: Creative Writing through Visual Art
Freire, Paulo. Education for Critical Consciousness. Trans. Myra Bergman Ramos
---. Pedagogy of Hope: Reliving Pedagogy of the Oppressed
---. Pedagogy of the Oppressed
Gardner, John. The Art of Fiction: Notes on Craft for Young Writers
---. On Becoming a Novelist
Goldberg, Natalie. Writng Down the Bones
Goleman, Boyatzis, McKee. Primal Leadership: Learning to Lead with Emotional IntelligenceGraff, Gerald. Beyond the Culture Wars: How Teaching the Conflicts Can Revitalize American Education
---. Professing Literature: An Institutional History
Grainger, T. Creativity and Writing: Developing Voice and Verve in the Classroom
Gudding, Gabriel. “From Petit to Langpo: a History of Solipsism and Experience in Mainstream American Poetry since the Rise of Creative Writing”
Harrington, Joseph. “Why American Poetry is Not American Literature”
Heller, Michael. "The Uncertainty of the Poet."
Illich, Ivan. Deschooling Society
Illich, Ivan. “The Cultivation of Conspiracy”
James, William. “Notes on Automatic Writing”
James, William. Talks to Teachers
Johnson, T. R. Refiguring Prose Style: Possibilities for Writing Pedagogy
Kamler, Barbara. Relocating the Personal: A Critical Writing Pedagogy
Kecht, Maria-Regina. Pedagogy is Politics: Literary Theory and Critical Teaching
Knights and Thurgar-dawson. Active Reading: Transformative Writing in Literary Studies
Krauth and Brady (eds.). Creative Writing: Theory Beyond Practice
Lacoue-LaBarthes, Phillip. The Literary Absolute
Lambirth, Andrew. Planning Creative Literacy Lessons
Lamott, Anne. Bird by Bird: Some Instructions on Writing and Life
Leahy, Anna (ed.). Power and Identity in the Creative Writing Classroom
Lee, Amy. Composing Critical Pedagogies: Teaching Writing as Revision
Magee, Michael. Emancipating Pragmatism: Jazz, Emerson, and Experimental Writing
Mathews, Harry. 20 Lines a Day
Mearns, Hughes. Creative Power
Mearns, Hughes. Creative Youth
Morton and Zavarzadeh. Theory/Pedagogy/Politics: Texts for Change
Motte, Warren F. Motte, Jr (ed). Oulipo: A Primer for Potential Literature
Moxley. Joseph M. Creative Writing in America: Theory and Practice
Myers, D. G. The Elephants Teach: Creative Writing since 1880
Nagin, Carol. Because Writing Matters: Improving Student Writing in our Schools
Ngai, Sianne. Ugly Feelings
Postman, Neil, and Charles Weingartner. Teaching as a Subversive Activity
Reed, Ishmael. Writin' is Fightin'
Ritter and Vanderslice. Can it Really Be Taught?: Resisting Lore in Creative Writing Pedagogy
Sampson, Fiona. Creative Writing in Health and Social Care
Searle, Chris. None but Our Words: Critical Literacy in Classroom and Community
Sondheim, Alan. Code Writing CD
Stein, Gertrude. How to Write
Sterling, Berdan, Boulton. Writing for a Change: Boosting Literacy and Learning through Social Action
Tight, Carl. Writing and Responsibility
Tyrrell, Jenny. Power and Fantasy in Early Learning: A Connective Pedagogy
Tzara, Tristan. Seven Dada Manifestoes and Lampistries (trans., Barbara Wright)
Watkins, Evan. Work Time: English Departments and the Circulation of Cultural Value
Winterowd, W. Ross. The English Department: A Personal and Institutional History
Wonder Boys. Paramount Pictures. 30 May 2000.
Worsham, Lynn. “Pedagogic Violence and the Schooling of Emotion”
Ziegler, Isabelle. Creative Writing.
ve-Geburah, ve-Gedulah! What happens when a crazy queer occultist with a penchant for radical re-imaginings of society and a taste for fantasy novels becomes a highschool English & Latin teacher? This blog. This is to be (I hope) a collection of my explorations into what I can create from the raw elements of my psyche for use in the classroom.
3.15.2008
3.14.2008
As I gathered resources for the list to your left (and for me to read) I found this
Q: Growing up in the American public school system, I am sure I am not alone in the experience of films being used as substitutes for actual education; if a video was being shown in class it was a reprieve from giving lessons for the teacher, and an opportunity to tune out for the students. You've argued in the past — including a presentation at the 2000 Renewing the Anarchist Tradition conference — that cinema has potential as a form of anarchist pedagogy. What is this potential, and is it in conflict with how we are generally taught to receive media images in this society, film in particular? When has this pedagogical potential been fulfilled in the past? Is it being fulfilled today?
Porton: The problem, as you imply, is that most of us -- and probably not just Americans -- associate words like "pedagogy" and "education" with drudgery and boredom, with classroom monotony instead of "recess." Given what I've written about aesthetic bliss above, I believe certain exemplary films offer a vision of "recess" instead of school. This belief engendered a desire to define a tangibly playful pedagogy -- manifestly pleasurable as well as instructive. (After all, even that old Stalinist Brecht hoped for a felicitous synthesis of "pleasure and instruction.").
Unfortunately, I had to confront the fact that some postmodern critics posited a superficially similar notion of pedagogy. I eventually dismissed the postmodern infatuation with pedagogy as arid, narcissistic and, in the final analysis, a dead end. A lot of these postmodernists, besotted with Derrida and his disciples, also invoke playfulness and opposition to rigid hierarchies. But I found their methodologies pseudo-radical since, whether consciously or not, they're more interested in the cleverness of their own deconstructive sleight of hand than in genuine social change or anti-authoritarian pedagogy.
I'd have to say that my notion of anarchist pedagogy was closely tied to a belief in the efficacy of self-emancipation, a vital, actually essential, component of anti-authoritarian politics. Political and personal autonomy are of course closely intertwined. If you read accounts of great periods of revolutionary upheaval -- e.g. the Paris Commune, the Spanish Revolution -- masses of people who once felt powerless became responsible for their own liberation. Similarly, anarchist filmmakers -- Vigo comes to mind -- are involved, perhaps unwittingly, in both self-emancipation and the creation of movies that allow viewers to emancipate themselves in a fashion that might be termed, if the terminology is made flexible, "pedagogical." In a parallel vein, activist filmmakers who chronicle social ferment also help to dissolve the boundaries between teaching others and teaching themselves. It would obviously be silly to assert that children don't need help from adults in learning to read and performing basic skills. But the fundamental goal is to eventually efface artificial divisions between teacher and student. A film like Zero for Conduct, which is such a perfect synthesis of lyrical beauty and anti-authoritarian critique, might enable us to pursue such a goal. And, in a more utilitarian fashion, non-fiction films are often a spur to action; the recipient of knowledge becomes more than a passive consumer.
Porton: The problem, as you imply, is that most of us -- and probably not just Americans -- associate words like "pedagogy" and "education" with drudgery and boredom, with classroom monotony instead of "recess." Given what I've written about aesthetic bliss above, I believe certain exemplary films offer a vision of "recess" instead of school. This belief engendered a desire to define a tangibly playful pedagogy -- manifestly pleasurable as well as instructive. (After all, even that old Stalinist Brecht hoped for a felicitous synthesis of "pleasure and instruction.").
Unfortunately, I had to confront the fact that some postmodern critics posited a superficially similar notion of pedagogy. I eventually dismissed the postmodern infatuation with pedagogy as arid, narcissistic and, in the final analysis, a dead end. A lot of these postmodernists, besotted with Derrida and his disciples, also invoke playfulness and opposition to rigid hierarchies. But I found their methodologies pseudo-radical since, whether consciously or not, they're more interested in the cleverness of their own deconstructive sleight of hand than in genuine social change or anti-authoritarian pedagogy.
I'd have to say that my notion of anarchist pedagogy was closely tied to a belief in the efficacy of self-emancipation, a vital, actually essential, component of anti-authoritarian politics. Political and personal autonomy are of course closely intertwined. If you read accounts of great periods of revolutionary upheaval -- e.g. the Paris Commune, the Spanish Revolution -- masses of people who once felt powerless became responsible for their own liberation. Similarly, anarchist filmmakers -- Vigo comes to mind -- are involved, perhaps unwittingly, in both self-emancipation and the creation of movies that allow viewers to emancipate themselves in a fashion that might be termed, if the terminology is made flexible, "pedagogical." In a parallel vein, activist filmmakers who chronicle social ferment also help to dissolve the boundaries between teaching others and teaching themselves. It would obviously be silly to assert that children don't need help from adults in learning to read and performing basic skills. But the fundamental goal is to eventually efface artificial divisions between teacher and student. A film like Zero for Conduct, which is such a perfect synthesis of lyrical beauty and anti-authoritarian critique, might enable us to pursue such a goal. And, in a more utilitarian fashion, non-fiction films are often a spur to action; the recipient of knowledge becomes more than a passive consumer.
3.13.2008
Non-Experimental Book Recommendation: Philip Pullman's His Dark Materials Trilogy
I want to recommend you read the His Dark Materials trilogy, the first book of which is the Golden Compass, the inspiration for the recent movie.
First of all, the movie sucks. Don't watch it. It is nothing but a mindless adventure story that will rot your brain. The books, on the other hand, will carry on an amazing level of conversation with you. It is written at the 5th or 6th grade reading level, so the mechanics of the writing (vocabulary, sentence structures, et cetera) won't be that difficult for you. Why is a prospective teacher recommending you read it? Because of that level of conversation I mentioned.
The book not only discusses a large number of themes -- centering around coming of age and various religious/spiritual/philosophical topics -- but actually converses with you about them. What do I mean by that? I mean to say that, as opposed to the vast majority of what posses for literature nowadays (and even what passes for canonical literature, that is, the "big name" literature you've no doubt been forced to read and re-read by this point), the book's exploration of these themes occurs at a pace and in such a manner as to respond to the your personal exploration of these themes.What are these themes? As I said, they center around coming of age, including the discovery of sexuality, even in the bowdlerized (or cleansed and sanitized; the "radio version") American version, and a whole host of themes concerning religion and the soul. These latter themes include the nature of religious hierarchy (that is, whether the church as an organization is good or bad for people), what it means to have a soul, what it means to BE a soul (who talks about that?!), fate and destiny, and cosmology (or the metaphysical structure of the universe). Interestingly, both of these major themes combine in the ongoing character conflict revolving around the development of morals. In fact, this last theme serves as the hinge around which all of the other themes turn, and is essential to, quite literally, all of the other themes. Oh, and, in the meantime, he connects and explores questions of quantum physics and historical narrative, the latter bypresenting numerous alternate histories which draw you in with their elaborateness and strangeness. Fair warning, though, the alternate history of the first book is filled with slightly-different terms for things and will thus be your only possible vocabulary problem in this book.
This is not to claim the books are boring. Philip Pullman manages, throughout all of this, to weave a thrilling tale filled with high adventure, conflict, battle, epic hubris, and, of course, blood. Philip Pullman is an atheist, and that informs much of his discussion, but because he still accepts the validity of various spiritual concepts -- and because of the afore-mentioned conversational nature of his thematic exploration -- the books don't try to convince you that his way is THE way. Rather, they let you figure out the truth for yourself.
I hope that I have inspired you to at least read these books. Thank you very much for taking the time to read this.
First of all, the movie sucks. Don't watch it. It is nothing but a mindless adventure story that will rot your brain. The books, on the other hand, will carry on an amazing level of conversation with you. It is written at the 5th or 6th grade reading level, so the mechanics of the writing (vocabulary, sentence structures, et cetera) won't be that difficult for you. Why is a prospective teacher recommending you read it? Because of that level of conversation I mentioned.
The book not only discusses a large number of themes -- centering around coming of age and various religious/spiritual/philosophical topics -- but actually converses with you about them. What do I mean by that? I mean to say that, as opposed to the vast majority of what posses for literature nowadays (and even what passes for canonical literature, that is, the "big name" literature you've no doubt been forced to read and re-read by this point), the book's exploration of these themes occurs at a pace and in such a manner as to respond to the your personal exploration of these themes.What are these themes? As I said, they center around coming of age, including the discovery of sexuality, even in the bowdlerized (or cleansed and sanitized; the "radio version") American version, and a whole host of themes concerning religion and the soul. These latter themes include the nature of religious hierarchy (that is, whether the church as an organization is good or bad for people), what it means to have a soul, what it means to BE a soul (who talks about that?!), fate and destiny, and cosmology (or the metaphysical structure of the universe). Interestingly, both of these major themes combine in the ongoing character conflict revolving around the development of morals. In fact, this last theme serves as the hinge around which all of the other themes turn, and is essential to, quite literally, all of the other themes. Oh, and, in the meantime, he connects and explores questions of quantum physics and historical narrative, the latter bypresenting numerous alternate histories which draw you in with their elaborateness and strangeness. Fair warning, though, the alternate history of the first book is filled with slightly-different terms for things and will thus be your only possible vocabulary problem in this book.
This is not to claim the books are boring. Philip Pullman manages, throughout all of this, to weave a thrilling tale filled with high adventure, conflict, battle, epic hubris, and, of course, blood. Philip Pullman is an atheist, and that informs much of his discussion, but because he still accepts the validity of various spiritual concepts -- and because of the afore-mentioned conversational nature of his thematic exploration -- the books don't try to convince you that his way is THE way. Rather, they let you figure out the truth for yourself.
I hope that I have inspired you to at least read these books. Thank you very much for taking the time to read this.